Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
"We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." What a paragraph! This sparse, 52-word opening of our Constitution did not merely launch a fledgling nation--but a bold experiment in democratic idealism.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Also in this issue:
Find more content in these topics: Labor
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 1999-2011
Nike's "freedom to choose"
Nike Inc. makes an offer to all of its customers who buy a pair of its pricey shoes: For a fee, the company will personalize the shoes by stitching any name or phrase you want under the swoosh. It's called the "Nike iD" program, which Nike says is "about freedom to choose and freedom to express who you are."
Jonah Peretti gave it a shot. He sent in his money and the word he wanted—only to get back a form letter stating that his Personal iD was rejected for one or more of the following reasons: (1) it contains someone else's trademark, (2) it contains the name of an athlete whose name is not licensed to Nike, or (3) it contains profanity or inappropriate slang.
Peretti's word was "sweatshop." He politely pointed out that it is not a trademark, an athlete's name, or profanity. But Nike sent another rejection letter, this time asserting that "sweatshop" fell under the heading of inappropriate slang.
Undaunted, Peretti wrote back, noting that "sweatshop" is not slang but standard English and defined by Webster's Dictionary as "a shop or factory in which workers are employed for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions."
Yet again, Nike said no, finally claiming that small print on its website allows it to reject any "material we consider inappropriate or simply do not want to place on our products."
Hmmm. We wonder what other words Nike's not likely to stitch on your shoes. "Democracy"? "Human rights"? "Just boycott it"?