There'll be a crush of cameras at the front door of the White House on January 20 as scores of media outlets scramble to record the moment that the new president walks in. But, wait--who're those people who'll be sliding in quietly behind him? They're the ones who'll spend the next four years whispering in the president's ear, sitting in strategy sessions, running presidential councils, filling agency slots, and pulling the levers of executive power.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Find more content in these topics: War
Visit Hightower's General Store, to buy high-power Hightower books and other goodies like that.
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 2003-2007
The money war continues
“United we stand,” cries George W. as he hurls himself into the war effort! “God Bless America,” shouts Dick Cheney as he girds himself for the combat ahead!
Are the president and the veep going to the front lines in the battle against the terrorism? Not exactly. Instead they are engaged in the political fund-raising wars here on the homefront.
Now that the ban on unregulated “soft money” has finally been passed, both the Republican and Democratic parties are mounting all-out pushes to raise as much of this corrupting special-interest money as they can get their fat little fingers around before the ban goes into effect on November 6.
The commander-in-chief’s war plan calls for him to headline two fund-raising events every week for the next few months. Asked if he thought using his war popularity for such a crass political purpose as sacking-up campaign cash was appropriate, he smirked and said: “Yes, I do.”
The elusive V.P., rarely seen in public these days, is surfacing to do two sorties a week in the fund-raising war.
Democrats are out there, too. Last month they took in the largest donation in the history of politics—a single check for $7 million from a Hollywood billionaire. They snagged another one for $5 million in the same week.
Isn’t it good to know that bipartisanship is alive and well in Washington?