Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Also in this issue:
In the 1970s, Lily Tomlin developed an iconic comic character she named Ernestine--a telephone clerk who took perverse pleasure from hectoring customers. Her character was a perfect portrayal of the arrogance of AT&T, the monopolistic telephone giant of that day. In one skit on on the TV show, Laugh-In, Tomlin had Ernestine delivering a TV pitch for the corporation:
"A gracious hello," she cheerfully began, speaking directly into the camera. "Here at the Phone Company, we handle 84 billion calls a year. So, we realize that every so often, you can't get an operator, or for no apparent reason your phone goes out of order, or perhaps you get charged for a call you didn't make. We don't care!"
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Find more content in these topics: Elections, Political corruption, Voting, Voting rights
Visit Hightower's General Store, to buy high-power Hightower books and other goodies like that.
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 1999-2010
MONOPOLIZING OUR VOTING SYSTEM
Voting is sacrosanct, right? Except that over the past decade, state and local election authorities have allowed something to come between the casting and the counting of our votes--privatization.
So, balloting, which has historically and properly been a purely public function, now relies on electronic machines that are made and controlled by a handful of corporations. These corporate computers are easily hacked, they break down on election day, they divert votes from one candidate to another, they drop votes, they mysteriously add votes--and they're expensive.
But the greatest problem is with the privatization concept itself. Voting is not a commodity or industry, it's a democratic right. To allow private interests to control the balloting mechanism--including allowing them to refuse to reveal their software codes --is a sacrilege that's destroying public trust in electoral integrity. Yet this privatization is about to be made geometrically worse by monopolization.
The largest purveyor of voting machines, ES&S, intends to buy out the second largest, now owned by the Diebold Corporation, a company that's notorious for unreliable equipment and publicly cheering on Republican candidates. This sale would give ES&S monopoly control of the voting systems in the vast majority of our cities and states.
Antitrust officials must stop this monopolization of America's most basic democratic process--and restore full public ownership and management of our voting systems. For more info, contact the reform group, Fair Vote at (301) 270-4616 or info@fairvote.org.