Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
June 2010, Volume 12, Number 6 |
Edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer |
If a political pollster came to my door and asked whether I consider myself a conservative or a liberal, I'd answer, "No."
Not to be cute--I have a bit of both in me--but because, like most Americans, my beliefs can't be squeezed into either of the tidy little boxes that the establishment provides.
Also, most of the big issues that our country faces defy right-left categorization. Take conservatism. It's a doctrine that classically embodies caution and...well, conservation. Yet the gushing and spreading Gulf Coast oil disaster was caused by people who proudly identify themselves as conservatives--including top executives of BP, Halliburton, and Transocean, as well as the top regulatory officials involved. However, they're not conservatives, they're anything-goes corporatists. Likewise, the five Supreme Court justices who recently enthroned corporate money over democracy (Lowdown, March 2010) are routinely labeled by the media as "conservative"--but their reckless rulings destroy our democratic values, rather than conserve them. Again, corporatists all.

As I've rambled through life, I've observed that the true political spectrum in our society does not range from right to left, but from top to bottom. This is how America's economic and political systems really shake out, with each of us located somewhere up or down that spectrum, mostly down. Right to left is political theory; top to bottom is the reality we actually experience in our lives every day--and the vast majority of Americans know that they're not even within shouting distance of the moneyed powers that rule from the top of both systems, whether those elites call themselves conservatives or liberals.
For me, the "ism" that best encompasses and addresses this reality is populism. What is it? Essentially, it's the continuation of America's democratic revolution. It encompasses and extends the creation of a government that is us. Instead of a "trickle down" approach to public policy, populism is solidly grounded in a "percolate up" philosophy that springs directly from America's founding principle of the Common Good.
Mike Hayne Good point. However, let's create a more real measurement. How many have finished paying a mortgage, thereby owning a property and existing as free citizens? How many are still paying a mortgage, thereby living as indentured servants? And how many will never have a mortgage or chance to own a property because they will never have that kind of money? Democrats and republicans all are paying mortgages, so they are actually the same group no matter what they say or learn from Beck or Maher. Hightower was talking about a top to bottom political system rather than a left or right. I have to stick with my position that the Bush Clinton gang besmirched Reagan's name while all the time stealing the bounty his practices generated. Basically, if you are paying a mortgage or have a house in the suburbs, you ain't one of us.
Yesterday I sent this message to Common Cause, an organization I have supported for many years.
Hi Bob:
Have you read Jim Hightower's most recent issue of The Lowdown? It's about populism and the importance of us all getting together. I've supported Common Cause for many years, as well as several other similar organizations, like Public Citizen and People for the American Way. Why can't you all start working together to create a groundswell of populist revolt against the corporate oligarchy that runs this country? Separately, all of the good organizations like Common Cause are a drop in the bucket against the power brokers in this country.
My wife, Florence, and I have decided that until Common Cause and similar organizations demonstrate serious efforts to unite against the common enemy, the corporate oligarchy that controls our elections and our country, we will no longer support you. We are going to direct our support to the several organizations that Jim Hightower lists in his most recent letter. These are groups that are trying to organize grassroots efforts like the Populist Movement of the 1890s. We need to get rid of the democrats and the republicans: both of these parties have become political prostitutes to the corporate elite and their legions of lobbyists. We need a new populist movement of farmers, workers, the unemployed, the under employed, and now, the disenfranchized middle class
Sincerely,
David Nichols
Most of the movements in the populist camp could be united under larger umbrella groups. Why not start a "baker's dozen" year of protest. Start in October of 2011. Pick a large corporation, Exxon-Mobil. All populist groups could boycott until the November, 2012 election. Each month, one of the umbrella groups would pick a target to boycott for a month. PETA and other animal right's activists might pick a large chemical company known for animal abuse, KFC, or perhaps Nieman-Marcus or some other fur seller. Activists against the banking industry might choose Chase bank for their month. ALL would join in each month's protest as well as the target for the year. Throughout the year, hold "Get out the vote" registration drives and rallies with speakers such as Jim Hightower and musicians such as David Rovics, Jim Page or Anne Feeney. Our goal would be to put a populist in the White House (dare I suggest Jim Hightower) and defeat as many incumbents as possible in the primaries and elect a progressive congress. One thing to keep in mind though:
Politician, n. A creation of the media and a puppet of the rich elite.
Good Politician, One who breaks his strings. Usually dead. See: Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, JFK, RFK, MLK, Paul Wellstone, Hale Boggs, and others.
Mike Hayne He was an elitist, New England person who knew what was best for the rest of us but would not have ever let any of us into his neighborhood. So JFK was ahead of his time, mimmicking the behavior of Bush sr (King George), Bill and Hillary Clinton, and now the youngster of this crime syndicate, Barrack. George W is one of us. Nixon, Reagan, Carter, Ford, were the good recent presidents. W was just there because he had to be or get a trip to the woodshed by his dad. I remember when George sr was literally crying on TV hugging Jeb and saying, "you should have been the one to be President". Way to go W. W's greatest feat was getting Barrack elected.
We can all make and wear our own t-shirts. My "Walmart" shirt: (front)
I Hate
Everything
Walmart
Stands For
(back)
But
Shopping
Local Is
Too
Expensive
On an income of $440 every two weeks Wal-marts prices are difficult to resist although I feel like a hypocrite every time I go there. Wearing this at Walmart makes me feel somewhat less of a hypocrite.
Mike Hayne You rich, man. Where can I get that kind of money, and I'm not joking. I love Walmart. Power to the people.
''We have a populist majority in America right now.''
It's just that most Americans don't know it, what with the media jamming teabaggers down our throats all day long.
My guess is there are many just trying to keep their heads above water, and they don't make the time to educate themselves.
We desperately need a populist movement, and my hope is that progressives will rally together sometime soon.
Mike Hayne Jim Hightower makes more sense than many of the tv personalities such as Beck (who has now out paced Oreilly) and Maher (who's "comedy" has no jokes in it and is so devoid of material he continues to harp on Reagan, the best president of the twentieth century).
As Hightower points out, the breakdown is top to bottom, but I believe we should also look at hoarded amounts. Most workers I know are not in indentured servitude to one day own a home and do not have a huge sum of so called "retirement" money hoarded. What would be an accurate measure of the up and down spectrum? $50,000 hoarded amount in savings or retirement accounts? How many citizens have more than $50,000 hoarded and how many have less?
L & J Countryman: Mike Hayne: Reagan was not a good president. He's the one who championed the downhill slide of economics for the common man, vehemently opposed unions, and believed in deregulation and started the dismantling of the Glass-Steagall act which protected the population from the excesses and plundering that have occurred and brought about this most recent recession. In answer to your question about who has the money, 72% of the wealth is controlled by 10% of the people.
It's a moral failure.
Mike Hayne To be serious for a moment, the United States is suffering a moral decline based on a failure of the Humanities departments of universities. They graduate the persons who then work in media and schools, thereby compounding the decline.
No Capitalist system can sustain if the people are morally bankrupt. Mike Hayne, 2009
Capitalism creates large funds that can then create large factories. Nowhere is it stated except in some retarded Hollywood movie, that greed is good. Greed has nothing at all to do with the theory of capitalism. The founders were Puritans, and anything but selfish and greedy. The purpose of capitalism is to maintain the businesses, not deplete them for some sick, baby boomer "I'm doing it for my family" scenario. The Mafia called it's gangs families. It's a sick concept.
Lowering wages would have worked if each corporation did not have a white collar level of thieves milking the money away from the enterprises. It's a general, accepted philosophy of life which I believe must come from university teachings to be so widespread. If you want meaning to life, go to church, don't steal money away from the businesses designed to maintain the country.
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]