May's Lowdown

May 2011, Volume 13, Number 5

Edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer

This is class war!

A battery of elected ideologues opens fire on those who serve the public

You're not likely to have known Robert Clark, Ruth West, Chet Newall, Webb Kamp, or Darrell Odom, but I wouldn't be who I am without them. And you might have a similar honor roll of those who spurred, inspired, lured, intrigued, goaded, and otherwise motivated you to do more than you might otherwise have done--a list of your special public school teachers. The junior-high, senior-high, and college teachers on my list largely sparked my lifelong interests in language, history, politics, and how (and for whom) government really works.

However, I was naive about their motivation. Little did I know at the time that their ilk are tax-sucking leeches, glorified babysitters, overpaid slugs who leave work at 3 p.m. and take the whole summer off. "Greedy," as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie barked at teachers in his state.

Thus America is suddenly at war against its own teachers-- along with its firefighters, police officers, public health researchers and caregivers, sanitation workers, census takers, park rangers, air traffic controllers, and the whole horde of 'do-nothings' on the public payroll. Fire 'em, bust their unions, take away their democratic rights, slash their pay, increase their workloads, eliminate their pensions, and (most especially) scorn them.

Those are not just the vitriolic sentiments of a few red-faced, tea-party lunatics--but of a squawking flock of right-wing governors, state legislators, mayors, and members of Congress. These are our leaders speaking!

[IRONIC ASIDE: The 'leaders' who're so wildly assailing public employees also happen to be public employees, and they consume a whole lot more of our tax dollars than those they're dissing. Gov. Christie, for example, siphons $175,000 a year from the public treasury in salary--far more than any of those "greedy" teachers in his state. And while politicos screech for deep cutbacks in rank and file workers, notice that they're not volunteering any givebacks in their own pay, pensions, health care, limousines, mansions, and other public subsidies. Apparently, they never had a teacher explain 'irony' to them, but it would be a better world if they took a remedial class on the concept. Oh, too late--teachers of irony have been fired.]

Funded and orchestrated by such hard-core, anti-laborite billionaires like the Kochs, DeVoses, Bradleys, Scaifes, Coorses, and Waltons, the right wing has declared open season on public employees. But don't think that the assault by corporate extremists stops there. Using the GOP and the tea partiers as their political foot soldiers--they intend to dismantle the public sphere, crush all unions, downsize the entire middle class, and banish egalitarianism as an American ideal. Ready or not, our nation has devolved into a new and nasty civil war, with moneyed elites now charging into legislatures and courts to separate their good fortunes from the working class and to establish themselves as a de facto plutocracy.


----The euphemism being used by various officials across the country to notify thousands of teachers that they are fired, as in: "You have been excessed."

"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice," declared Sen. Barry Goldwater in his failed presidential try in 1964. Today, though, the billionaires masquerading as Goldwater's libertarian heirs are seeking only to 'liberate' themselves from our democratic society's essential rules of fair play. They resent paying taxes for anything that benefits others, they demand freedom from regulation of their corporate excesses, and they absolutely reject the notion that workers, consumers, environmentalists, and other community interests should have any power over corporate whim.

Their sense of entitlement is nauseating, and their ongoing militant maneuvering in state after state to dis-empower America's workaday majority constitutes a declaration of war against our people's democracy. "Extremism in the defense of elitism" is their ugly purpose. That is a vice.

Ugly Number One is that theirs is a most uncivil war. It's based on demonizing some of the best and most useful workers in our country, pitting these people's very modest incomes and perfectly reasonable benefits against those who've been knocked down and have less. "Don't look at us," shout the corporatists who've been doing the downsizing and privatizing, outsourcing and offshoring--that have knocked down the middle class and held down the poor. "Instead, look at those just above you who are struggling to stay in the middle class. It's unfair that they have health coverage and you don't, so let's pull them down, too."

Who benefits from that?

The good news is that folks mostly have not swallowed this divide-and-conquer battle cry. Polls are consistently showing widespread opposition to right-wing proposals to fire the masses of pubic employees and rescind the rights of unions. The bad news is that GOP governors and congressional leaders don't give a damn about the will of the people; they're listening to the will of Big Money. So Ugly Number Two in the elitists' war is their willingness to use raw autocratic power to ram through their anti-worker agenda.

How ironic (there's that word again) that those purporting to be champions of "small, inobtrusive government" are quite comfortable with big, invasive, bullying government slapping down millions of America's working families. Let's take a tour of just a half-dozen battlefields in this rapidly expanding war:

FLORIDA. When newly elected Republican Gov. Rick Scott declared last year that he would run this state's government like a business, it was no idle threat. He had previously been CEO of the giant health care conglomerate Columbia/HCA, where he presided over massive Medicare fraud that cost his culprit corporation a $1.7 billion federal fine and cost him his job.

Scott is a failed corporate executive, but he made off with a personal fortune, so naturally he dove into politics. His money allowed him to 'win' a three-way race for the governor's mansion with only 49 percent of the vote. Bringing his finely honed sense of big business ethics to the job, Scott is on a rampage to bust teachers and other wage-earners, slash services that regular people need, and make his state a safe haven for plutocrats. In only his first four months, Hizzoner has:

Demoralized Florida teachers (already among the lowest paid in the country) by moving a bill requiring each of them to reapply for their job every year, with renewal of their contract dependent on how their students perform on a single standardized test. The bill will force more teaching-to-the-test and less classroom innovation, setting up even good teachers for failure and making the profession less desirable. In addition, Scott is a 'don't-tax-the-rich' zealot, so the state's budget deficit is to be substantially narrowed by firing teachers and increasing the workloads of those who remain.

Depressed (both economically and psychologically) Florida's hard-hit workforce by pushing legislation to cut jobless payments. With 11.5 percent unemployment, and with some of the most miserly unemployment benefits in the country, Scott is slashing the number of weeks that out-of-work Floridians can get jobless aid to as low as 12 weeks, rather than the standard 26. To add to his Scrooginess, his proposal also makes it easier for a corporation to fire employees, making workers ineligible for any unemployment assistance. As the house sponsor of Scott's bill explained, "Businesses need the state's help."

Worked diligently to help one business in particular: his own. After being dumped by Columbia/HCA, Scott set up Solantic, a Florida chain of emergency care clinics. As guv, he is working to privatize Medicaid, which would create a huge statewide customer base of poor people for a certain chain of clinics tied directly to Scott (lest you think this is self-serving, the governor made a point of divesting his interest in Solantic just before taking office--he transferred ownership to his wife, literally putting his interest at arms length! This was so stinky that he later was forced to sell it).

Issued an executive order requiring drug tests on thousands of state workers and every future applicant for state jobs. He's also pressing the legislature to mandate drug tests for all the hard-luck Floridians who apply for welfare benefits. Welcome to Rick Scott's Florida--please pee to prove your innocence! Now, guess which corporation is in the drug-testing business? Yes, Solantic.

Catered to the rich. He has proposed massive tax cuts to corporations and millionaires, even as he wants to whack state education spending by 10 percent and taken an average of $2,300 a year out of each teacher's paycheck. Moreover, in a perfect snapshot of his class-based values, Scott has tried to eliminate state spending on two historically black universities, while trying to funnel taxpayer dollars into the construction of golf courses in state parks.

MAINE. For sheer crudeness in going after labor, it'll be tough to top Paul LePage, the new gubernatorial potentate of the pine tree state. Previously the manager of a chain of discount surplus and salvage stores, this right winger won the five-way governor's race last fall with only 38 percent of the vote. Unencumbered by humility, LePage has interpreted his meager percentage as a sweeping mandate to repeal workers' bargaining rights, restrict the ability of unions to collect dues from their members, cut pension benefits for state employees (though he mercifully exempted one--himself), raise the retirement age for public workers, cut programs that benefit Maine's middle class (while generously lowering the tax bill for the state's richest one percent), and even roll back child labor laws!

Then he literally raised disdain for working families to high art. In March, the governor dictated that an 11-panel mural be removed from the state labor department's lobby. The piece depicts scenes from the state's rich labor history, but the governor says it represents a "one-sided decor" that reflects poorly on his pro-corporate agenda. Also, his office claims that "some business owners" complained, including one who saw the painting as an attempt to "brainwash the masses." So, ever attentive to the artistic sensibilities of unnamed corporate executives, the mural was 'disappeared.'

This made LePage a national joke--"The most moronic and mindless anti-worker gesture in the country," editorialized the Hartford Courant, and the Maine People's Alliance ridiculed him as "the state's interior decorator." The sharpest sting, though, came from the US Labor Department. Pointing out that the mural had been paid for by a federal grant under George W. Bush's regime, the feds are dunning LePage to return the money or reinstall the artwork. The governor's office is presently studying its options.

MICHIGAN. Rick Snyder posed as a moderate Republican to win the governorship last November. But the real Rick turns out to be a flaming corporatist.

In a state desperate for programs to help its hard-hit working families, Snyder's first budget priority was to give corporations a 60 percent cut in taxes. To help make up for that revenue loss, he proposed to tax the pensions of working class retirees and kill the state's earned income tax credit for the poor.

Then came his low blow to Michigan's huge number of jobless folks. He snuck a provision into law that stops unemployment benefits after 20 weeks, taking away six weeks of assistance that every other state provides. The state chamber of commerce gloated that "it's a huge win for job providers" (aka, corporate barons). Indeed, the slick move will save corporations about $300 million a year--money taken right out of the hide of jobless people.

But the jaw-dropper is his Local Government Fiscal Accountability Act. This tyrannical law effectively authorizes Snyder to seize control of local governments, suspend democratic sovereignty, and hand municipal authority and assets to the corporations of his choice. He can declare that any city, county, school district, etc... is 'insolvent' and then appoint a manager to run the entity. This autocratic regent, which may be a private corporation, would have the power to bypass and even dismiss elected officials, commandeer the public budget, cancel all contracts (including collective bargaining agreements), decertify public employee unions, sell off assets, and even dis-incorporate the local entity.

It's the reincarnation of King George III, dressed in corporate splendor.

OHIO. John Kasich, a former GOP congressman, routinely bashed Ohio's unions in his 2010 gubernatorial run.

Backed financially by the likes of the Koch Brothers and Rupert Murdoch, he is now backing their vision of a union-free America. His club of choice is a draconian law that bars teachers and other public employees from striking for any reason, punishes any workers who participate in a walkout, eliminates automatic pay raises, bans any union effort to limit privatization of a government function, prohibits police and firefighters from access to binding arbitration in contract disputes, and only allows public employees to bargain with their governmental bosses when the bosses say they can.

Kasich excuses this by asserting that he was elected to make drastic cuts in state spending, including in the pay of these workers. But he has spared a few workers --those in his own office. For example, he is paying his chief of staff $170,000 a year, nearly $50,000 more than the position previously paid. To get "good people to come in" to government, Kasich said without a trace of irony, you have to offer good salaries.

None of this has endeared him to Ohioans. The public opposed his attack on working people (it passed by only one vote in the state senate), his approval rating after just three months in office has crashed to 30 percent, a sizable majority now would vote for his 2010 opponent, and there's a move to recall him.

But, for the moment, hundreds of thousands of Ohio workers have had their rights and financial well-being sacrificed at the Koch-Kasich altar of corporate ideology.

TEXAS. Gov. Rick Perry brags that he's made the lone star state "corporate-friendly." Here's what that friendliness buys you: While Texas' unemployment rate is not as bad as most states (it ranks a so-so 22nd), the wage structure here is deliberately worker-hostile--average hourly pay is the 44th lowest in the country. Texas is, however, at or near the top when it comes to the poverty rate, the percentage of people with no health insurance, the income gap between rich and poor, the most regressive tax system, the cost of electric bills, and the rate of high school dropouts.

Then there's the radioactive $27 billion budget deficit that Perry has run up--the second-highest in the country. So who's expected to bear this deficit burden? The middle class and the poor, of course, including at least 100,000 school teachers who're now getting their "excessed" notices. Perry's budget chops current school spending by nearly $8 billion, even as student enrollment soars. Teachers and kids must absorb the shortfall, says Texas Rick, because he can't bear to hike the meager taxes paid by corporations and the rich, nor will he stand for eliminating their tax loopholes and state subsidies. Texas budget writers admit that they will not begin to meet the state's basic needs and that Perry's stripped down budget will cost Texans 335,000 more jobs in the next two years. They're praying that theirs are not among them.

WISCONSIN. This is where America's middle class first planted its flag and confronted the civil war. As the Lowdown reported last month, newbie-Gov. Scott Walker's extremist, anti-worker agenda (developed for him by Koch-funded corporate front groups) sparked a massive grassroots rebellion of ordinary Wisconsinites, and they are not going away. In substance, Walker's attack on laboring people is much like his fellow right-wing guvs in other states. But he has been especially arrogant, autocratic, and abusive in trying to ram it into law, essentially operating as an above-the-law, tinhorn tyrant. Walker and his legislative henchmen--openly backed by Koch money and operatives--are big government on a rampage. Here are just a few of their ends-justify- the-means tactics:

WHEN 14 STALWART DEMOCRATIC SENATORS left the state for Illinois to deny Walker the necessary quorum needed to pass his bill killing collective bargaining, his senate leader changed the rules so the 14 could not get their paychecks. When this silliness failed to lure any of them back, Walker's team plotted to send state troopers to arrest them--even though they had broken no laws.

FURIOUS AT THE DEMOCRATS, Walker got real petty. His legislative leaders decreed that the staffs of the 14 absent senators could not use copying machines in the capitol. That'll teach 'em!

WITH OUTRAGED PROTESTORS swarming into the capitol daily, Walker arbitrarily locked it down, illegally shutting peaceful Wisconsin citizens out of their own building.

FROM THE START, Walker loudly insisted that suspending public employee rights was necessary to balance the state budget. Finally, though, with Democrats still denying him a quorum, he suddenly dropped his fiscal responsibility pose, stripped the bill of all budget numbers, and--in a coup with little advance notice and no debate--slammed the anti-worker provisions through.

A LAWSUIT, however, claims the bill's passage was illegal because senate leaders violated the open meetings law to sneak it through. To consider this, a judge has temporarily blocked the statute--but Walker's agents made an end run and simply declared it enacted. No, said the judge, reinstating her injunction.

WITH THE BATTLE NOW IN COURT, the GOP senate leader issued a new rule dictating that while the 14 senate Democrats are free to attend committee meetings and cast votes--"those votes will not count." He was later forced to withdraw this autocratic absurdity.

This is war

The Powers That Be don't like us thinking in terms of class war, or even using the phrase. But from the ever-expanding wealth gap to the relentless downsizing and offshoring of American jobs, from the Supreme Court's enthronement of corporate political money to the state-by-state offensive on worker power--what else can it be called?

The six states above are certainly not the only battlefields--perhaps your governor, mayor, and congressional members are pushing the same attack. Did all of these officials independently and simultaneously choose to side with wealth against the rest of us--or is this a coordinated push? If it's the latter, what can you and I do about it? In the June Lowdown, we'll follow up on these questions with Chapter Two on America's Civil War.

Bookmark and Share



As noted in the article above, Barry Goldwater famously said in his failed presidential bid in 1964, "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice." Yes, that is true if it really is extremism in defense of liberty. That was the case during the American Revolution, but nowadays extremism does not defend the liberty of "We the People," it defends the privileges, prerogatives, and economic interests of a tiny portion of the people, and this vicious form of extremism is accomplishing its goals by corrupting democracy, the only viable counterforce to elitism and autocratic power.

The agenda of the six state governors mentioned in the article is more than a war against workers. These governors are probably not aware that they are assisting in the corruption of democracy--believing rather that they are saving it--when in fact they are fostering the transformation of democracy in America into a Plutonomy, in which an elite bloc of billionaires and corporatists render democracy, through the power of money, a mere shell of its former self.

As more and more economies are tied together through the electronic transactions of trans-national corporations, the plutonomist elite will take front and center on the world stage, powering economic growth--what there is of it--largely for the benefit of the wealthiest upper class of society. The rest of the world's population will be ruthlessly exploited and left to its own meager devices, and to such an extent that the privileged plutonimists and their in-house slaves will barricade themselves within corporate enclaves, leaving the masses to forge gang allegiances in the decaying cities. Marge Piercy, in her novel "He, She, and It," has created a vivid portraits of just such a future.

However, extremes always breed their opposites. The political backlash may come sooner than expected. Intransigence is not a state that can be maintained without extreme consequences.

-- posted by TomBrennan at 11:05am, May 23, 2011
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]

The Bush Clinton Gang

If Hillary had been elected instead of O Bomb Ya, the United States would have been controlled for twenty four years by a father, a husband, a son, and a wife. Amazing. It certainly is class warfare, but putting labels such as democrat and republican on the classes is not correct.

The great teachers of the 1960s cannot be compared to the current teachers. On a school day last week thousands of students came forth from the high schools in Los Angeles to protest. They were not doing anything anyway, I guess, so they might as well be outside in traffic. Basically, a usual pattern occurs in these types of situations. The teachers will find one good, hardworking teacher making $35,000 a year and standing in front of a class eight hours a day. Oh, look at this poor guy. Would you take food out of his mouth? But, different from the 1960s, behind this one good teacher would be fifty earning twice as much and teaching four hours a day. One educated woman in my office tried to defend the Los Angeles protest. "Do you know that for every hour in class a teacher must spend 19 hours preparing the lesson plan?" Hey, I only said they are bad because they teach four hours a day, but by this woman's math they teach two hours out of a forty hour week.

I think Hightower is one of the best sites on the web. I hope the debate can focus on the universities where ignorant philosophies are being taught that then spread to the teachers and the people who work in television. I guess we could include government and business as places where poorly educated college graduates hold sway. Examples could be Palin, Trump, Bill Maher, and O Bomb Ya. Are Palin and Maher college educated?

-- posted by Mike Hayne at 11:24am, May 16, 2011
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]

Far-right's Bile

Steve Marshall

Far-Right's Bile

Destructive as shrapnel,
explosive their words.
And reekingly crapful
like impacted turds.

Give them a laxative
or some other relaxative.
Or sweeten their bile
with something less vile
than whatever they lace into teas
at Tea Party's odd reveries,
where in strange vanity
they think not inanity
their rapture endorsing insanity.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-- posted by Steve Marshall at 9:10am, May 4, 2011
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]

Michigan's EFM law

Do I understand this part of the law correctly; that an EFM can receive income from "other" sources while serving as an EFM???? Does this include income as an employee, contractor, or consultant?

Take Benton Harbor, Michigan (pun intended). Could the EFM work for, or be a paid representative/lobbyist/etc. for the Whirlpool Corporation or proposed golf estates development group and then sell or otherwise transfer the disputed public park property to them? How about $0 deals? Can an EFM establish policies and laws? Tax rates (or lack thereof)?

If this is the case, the possibilities are beyond scary! Imminent domain gone wild? "Engineered" demographics?

I still can't wrap my head around how what is being done in Michigan can possibly be constitutional or legal. Talk about a bloodless coup of the most insidious kind. You'd think the Tea Party protesters would be everywhere omnipresent... Without campaign finance reform, what can possibly stop government OF the people, BY the wealthy, FOR the wealthy?

-- posted by cherty at 9:05am, May 3, 2011
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]

Michigan's EFM Law

Yes, the Emergency Manager can receive other income besides that paid by the failing municipality or school district as his 'salary'. Joseph Harris, the EM for Benton Harbor is paid $132,000 (set by the state Treasury Department's emergency financial loan board) and paid annually by the community! And he is also authorized to hire others to do his bidding (and be paid by the locals he is supposed to be helping).

The public school support was changed in the early 1990s from local property taxes to a state allocated funding per student. Sadly, Michigan has been cutting the State budgets for most of a decade, affecting schools and local governments. Many local entities have cut until now school boards and city commissions are between that rock and a hard place. The insidious thing is the state is again severely cutting the per pupil funding, as well as revenue sharing to municipal entities. Since the EFM law can be triggered by several forms of debt, the local officials must make very damaging cuts in an effort to avoid the law.

What a well planned destruction of public education and local control of government! And engineered by the party that believes in local control and small government on the national level!

-- posted by JuneTC at 10:16am, May 3, 2011
[ Report this comment as spam/abuse? ]