Earth to Congress: where are we going, and
How did we get in this handbasket?
Also in this issue
- Will work for food
- Texas' no-can-do governor
- Nancy's corporate pals
- Wall street strikes back
- Bush's pr boo-boo
After casting her ballot for Barack Obama, Amanda Jones said simply, "I feel good about voting for him." Ms. Jones, of Cedar Creek, Texas (a town just south of Austin), is African-American, and what gives her vote some historic punch is that she's 109 years old. Her father was a slave. Her mother was born right after Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation. She's been through it all--Jim Crow segregation, women's suffrage, the Great Depression, the poll tax, FDR, the civil-rights movement, desegregation, 13 years of George W (five as guv, eight as prez), and now: Barack Obama. This last change fills her with joy, she says.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Find more content in these topics: Common good, Corporate greed
Visit Hightower's General Store, to buy high-power Hightower books and other goodies like that.
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 2003-2007
Wall street strikes back
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page is the unofficial mouthpiece for Corporate America. Its writers are constantly carping about how the rich are just damned near bent over double with the burden of having to support the government with their taxes.
Recently, however, they had an astonishing conversion: They came out for more taxes! Not on them and their ilk. On us—the working stiffs and poor folks.
You can’t make up stuff this good. The editors wailed from on high about “The Non-Paying Class,” declaring that us hoi polloi “pay little or no taxes” and need to be forced by Washington to pay more in order to relieve the burden of those at the top.
They singled out a poor, hypothetical lowest-tax-bracket schmoe who’s making $12,000 a year. This person, the editors complained, “pays a little less than 4% of income in taxes.” They dubbed such people “lucky duckies.”
Hello? Trying to eke out a living on 12 grand a year is the exact opposite of “lucky.” It’s poverty—and it ought not to be taxed at all.
When the Journal jokers talk about who pays the most taxes, they refer only to federal income taxes, leaving out the regressive burdens of our payroll taxes, state and local taxes, sales taxes, gasoline taxes, fees, and a host of other assessments. Add these in, and us slobs at the bottom pay the same rates or higher than the swells at the top.