Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
We're being told by today's High Priests of Conventional Wisdom that everyone and everything in our economic cosmos necessarily revolves around one dazzling star: the corporation. This heavenly institution, the HPCW explain, has such financial and political mass that it is the optimal force for organizing and directing our society's economic affairs, including the terms of employment and production.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Also in this issue:
Find more content in these topics: Corporate greed
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 1999-2011
The run for the money
Time for another report from the Wide, Wide, Wide, WILD World of Sports. This year's thoroughbred horse-racing season was a thriller! I'm not talking about strong-hearted Smarty Jones' run at being the first horse to win the Triple Crown in 26 years. No, I'm talking about the thrilling breakthrough made by jockeys this Triple Crown year. A group of them filed and won a federal lawsuit allowing them to advance the cause of horse-racing by—prepare to be thrilled—wearing corporate advertising on their racing pants! .
Is this a great country, or what? .
The stars of NASCAR and the PGA can plaster their outfits with ads, so why not jockeys? It's a First Amendment issue, they told the court. Besides, corporate ads could pay them $30,000 apiece. .
The good news? Not all standards of tastefulness have been trampled by this ruling. For one, jockey pants at the Derby cannot promote gambling, which strikes me as a bit odd, since gambling is to horse-racing as bread is to butter. Also, a jockey's corporate ad cannot conflict with the track's own sponsors—no Chevy logos, for example, at Ford's Derby (again, a bit odd, since the case was said to be about free speech). Finally, the ads cannot be "inappropriate," which is a bit vague, but I guess this rules out promos for glue or horsehide furniture