Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
We're being told by today's High Priests of Conventional Wisdom that everyone and everything in our economic cosmos necessarily revolves around one dazzling star: the corporation. This heavenly institution, the HPCW explain, has such financial and political mass that it is the optimal force for organizing and directing our society's economic affairs, including the terms of employment and production.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Also in this issue:
Find more content in these topics: Common good, Corporate responsibility
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 1999-2011
Put the "public" back in pbs
Whatever happened to the "public" in PBS, the Public Broadcasting System? The original mandate for this public network was to offer programming different from the commercial networks, and specifically to "provide a voice for groups that may otherwise be unheard." Professor William Hoynes of Vassar College has done an independent analysis of PBS programming, viewing all the news shows, interview shows, business, and documentary programs for a two-week period. His findings are stunning.
Consider the coverage of politics. Like every other network, half of PBS's sources were the same old establishment politicians and government officials, a third were journalists, and 11% were corporate executives, lobbyists or PR flaks. Consumer, environmental, or labor sources were almost invisible.
How about PBS's coverage of economics? Fully 75% of the voices on the air were from the corporate world. Most of the others were from academics or government. Labor was only 1.5% of the total, consumer advocates were less than half of 1%, and the general public less than 2%.
Prof. Hoynes' study is on the Web site of Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (www.fair.org).