Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
Help us out by throwing some cash in the bucket:
Click here to read Hightower's personal message about
REAL CHANGE
(not small change)
We're being told by today's High Priests of Conventional Wisdom that everyone and everything in our economic cosmos necessarily revolves around one dazzling star: the corporation. This heavenly institution, the HPCW explain, has such financial and political mass that it is the optimal force for organizing and directing our society's economic affairs, including the terms of employment and production.
Sign up for email alerts, from breaking news to weekly commentary:
Also in this issue:
Find more content in these topics: Environment
Have a gander at the whole store here...
Home | Contact | RSS | Privacy policy | Copyright Public Intelligence, Inc., all rights reserved 1999-2011
Hot peppers and 4-year tacos
It's bad enough that food scientists have used genetic manipulation to create dangerous Frankenfoods, but now they've definitely gone too far: They're messing with Mexican food. I bring you two alarming examples from the government-funded laboratories at Texas A&M University.
First, a scientist there has created a low-heat habanero pepper. Yoo-hoo, professor— the whole idea of the habanero is that it's the gold standard of what a ridiculously hot pepper should be.
But, cries the professor, with our new, meek habanero, all the people who shy away from the heat can now eat one. Yoo-hoo, again—there are hundreds of varieties of peppers, all with varying degrees of hot. You want meek? Eat a pimento.
Meanwhile, another prof at A&M is messing with the simple, fresh-every-day tortilla. To please corporate distributors, he's created a flour tortilla that will stay "fresh" without refrigeration for more than a month...perhaps up to four years.
How many people are thinking that what America really needs is a non-hot habanero and a tortilla that'll last four years? And how many of us think this is what our tax-supported scientists should be working on?